FAMILY PROSPERITY DUTY
CAPITALISM SILVER & GOLD BULLION HEALTH WE
THE PEOPLE IN RESERVE INDEPENDENT CHARITY
AMERICAN PITCHFORK'S DUPAYOSHAS OF THE WEEK
American Pitchfork Manifesto: Tipping Point on the Road to Amarabia?
A Fictional Retrospective From the Great Beyond
By Pitchfork © 2009-2012
. . . . . . .
Freely quote with attribution
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
Dupayosha of the Week of January 23, 2012 Brian Douglas Williams, Sorosian
~ Teacher: Class. Who can use the same word base in seven different word forms in the same sentence?
Tommy: Oh. Oh. Me. Teacher. I can. The talking heads taught me so. So inspiring.
Teacher: You go, guy.
Tommy: Can it be that a schmuck schmucks schmuckingly – schmuckeru-a-um?
Teacher: G’ boy. But that’s only six different word forms.
Tommy: Schmuck us.
Teacher: Attaboy. ~
“A censor is a man who knows more than he thinks you ought to.“ Laurence J. Peter
“Once you permit those
who are convinced of their own superior rightness to censor and silence and
suppress those who hold contrary opinions, just at that moment the citadel has
been surrendered.” Archibald MacLeish
PART THE FIRST
“Mr. Gingrich, a former House speaker, on Tuesday morning threatened not participate [sic] in any future debates with audiences that have been instructed to be silent. That was the case on Monday, when Brian Williams of NBC News asked the audience of about 500 people who assembled for a debate in Tampa to hold their applause until the commercial breaks.
. . .
“Mr. Gingrich clearly noticed something was off, too. ‘We’re going to serve notice on future debates,’ he told Fox. ‘The media doesn’t control free speech. People ought to be allowed to applaud if they want to.’ ”
“Gingrich Says He Will Skip Debates if Audiences Can’t Participate” By JEREMY W. PETERS, thecausus.blogs.nytimes.com, January 24, 2012
PART THE SECOND
“Newt Gingrich has no interest in being a participant in another debate where the audience isn’t allowed to audibly react.
. . .
“ ‘I think he took them out of it,’ Gingrich said of NBC moderator Brian Williams, ‘because the media is terrified that the audience is going to side with the candidates against the media, which is what they’ve done in every debate.’
. . .
“UPDATE: I called up the Commission on Presidential Debates, which handles the general election debates, and they confirmed that audience participation has not been allowed in the past in debates [Ed.: How'd that work for ya?], and will not be allowed this cycle either. So, if Gingrich is the GOP nominee, he’ll have to face a silent audience during his debates with the President unless the rules are changed.
“UPDATE II: Asked if the Gingrich campaign would ask the Commission to change the rule requiring the audience to be silent if Gingrich became the nominee, Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond e-mails NRO, ‘Yes, we would. If we have learned one thing it is [that] people, not the media-moderators, pick the winner.’ ”
“Gingrich: ‘Wrong’ for NBC to Prohibit Audience Clapping at Debate” by Katrina Trinko, thecorner.com, January 24, 2012
. . . . . . .
If you are a first time visitor, please stop by the Site Map for a good look at this contemporary political website, economics, and social website of poor man’s political science theory, satire, and brief studies in economics and global economic development and financial market issues and analyses for insight and entertainment and more, more, more - a miracle, emergency preparedness and survivability, poetry, a futuristic next wave of destiny, key words of irreverence, dupa royalty and wanna be.
Contact: jrp2h2000@yahoo.com
•
Privacy Policy
